CAST HIGHLIGHT - Campaigns - Is there any basis for doing multiple iterations of analysis?

Survey and or code scan may have to be repeated depending upon the requirement such as to check the vulnerabilities introduced within each development sprint or to understand the health of an application with each release or any other scenarios.

 

Details

Below are the two options

1. Manual scan with the Code Reader <OR>
2. Automated scan + Upload with the CLI
   

Below are the brief steps

1. Initial campaign: Create a campaign with the app - survey and/or code scan which can be made the baseline.
2. Iterations: Depending upon the requirement - survey and/or code scan

For more details please refer

Define the frequency of analysis: automated or not?

in

Best practices on how to setup CAST Highlight campaigns for optimal results

 

Ticket

25616

 

Related Articles

CAST HIGHLIGHT - Survey - Warning: Survey might already been answered on another campaign for same date

CAST HIGHLIGHT - Survey - Survey not appearing when campaign is created

CAST HIGHLIGHT - Campaigns - Modified survey details of a closed campaign not getting reflected in the results

CAST HIGHLIGHT - Campaigns - Trend is not visible because HL application scanning Date is the Campaign Closing Date not the Current Date

CAST HIGHLIGHT - Campaigns - Not able to see any results in portal after uploading results to an existing campaign

Best practices on how to setup CAST Highlight campaigns for optimal results

 

Additional Resources

CAST Highlight Troubleshooting Guides

CAST Highlight Product Documentation